'A lie is still a lie': NY judge says expert 'lost all credibility' — tosses Trump’s civil fraud case motion



Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron on Monday dismissed, “for at least the fifth time,” former President Donald Trump’s motion “for a directed verdict” in his New York civil fraud trial case, The Messenger reports.

“A lie is still a lie,” Engoron noted In his 3-page ruling, writing:

Defendants also trot out two of their standard canards, that valuations are subjective and that the law only penalizes “material” deviations. These both fall into the category of “Let no one be fooled." Valuations, as elucidated ad nauseam in this trial, can be based on different criteria analyzed in different ways. But a lie is still a lie.

Engoron continued:

Valuing occupied residences as if vacant, valuing restricted land as if unrestricted, valuing an apartment as if it were triple its actual size, valuing property many times the amount of concealed appraisals, valuing planned buildings as if completed and ready to rent, valuing golf courses with brand premium while claiming not to, and valuing restricted funds as cash, are not subjective differences of opinion, they are misstatements at best and fraud at worst.

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to hold office again?


The ruling also referenced Trump’s expert witnesses, including Eli BartovEli Bartov, a tenured NYU Stern School of Business professor who was paid “nearly $900,000” in legal fees to testify for the former president.

Earlier this month, Bartov testified on behalf of Trump in New York Attorney General Letitia James’ fraud case against the former president, telling the court it’s “absurd to argue that ... any bank or any lender would make lending decision based on a statement of financial condition."

"By doggedly attempting to justify every misstatement, Professor Bartov lost all credibility," Engoron wrote.

The judge noted Bartov’s “overarching point was that the subject’s statements of financial condition were accurate in every respect.”

READ MORE: NYU professor hired by Trump defense for $900k calls NY AG’s complaint 'absurd'

But, for Engoron, that just proves “for a million or so dollars, some experts will say whatever you want them to say."

READ MORE: Why Clarence Thomas just became 'even more difficult' for Republicans 'to defend': analysis



from Alternet.org https://ift.tt/GPHrZqQ
via sinceretalk

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PA GOP Senate candidate who says he 'started with nothing' actually grew up in a mansion

Image
David McCormick, who is Pennsylvania's presumptive Republican U.S. Senate nominee, has often suggested he grew up poor in a rural community. But a new report finds that his upbringing was far more affluent than he's suggested. The New York Times reported Friday that McCormick — a former hedge fund executive who lived in Connecticut as recently as 2022 — has been cagey with voters about his childhood. McCormick has tweeted that he was "raised in Bloomsburg working on his family's farm," said on a 2022 podcast that he " started with nothing " and told CBS News that same year that he " didn't have anything " growing up as the son of two schoolteachers. But according to the Times , McCormick's father, Dr. James H. McCormick , was appointed president of what is now Bloomsburg University by Gov. Milton Schapp (D) in 1973. He moved his family into Buckalew Place — the official mansion for presidents of the school that currently spans 5...
Read more

How misinformation could shape the Israel-Hamas war

Image
I wanted to interview Nicholas Grossman regarding the role of misinformation in the war between Israel and Hamas. In particular, I hoped to ask the professor of international relations at the University of Illinois, and senior editor of Arc Digital , about misinformation that arose from American reporting on an explosion at a hospital in Gaza. You know what? I ended up repeating a bit of misinformation! I asked him to lay out the facts about a blast that “killed hundreds, including kids,” and he said nuh-uh (not his words). In fact, Professor Grossman said, “there never were hundreds killed by an explosion at that hospital. Media reported that the hospital was destroyed by an Israeli airstrike killing 500, but that was based on something a Hamas-controlled agency said and was never supported by evidence.” Professor Grossman went on to say “what apparently did happen is something hit a nearby parking lot and caused a smaller explosion, most likely a rocket fired from Gaza towards I...
Read more

Trump was hit by glass fragments — not a bullet: report

Image
Law enforcement officials have claimed to two different sources that former President Donald Trump was not grazed by a bullet but rather by glass shards. The officials in question told both Newsmax's Alex Salvi and Axios' Juliegrace Brufke that Trump was hit by glass shards that may have erupted from the shattering of a teleprompter that was hit by gunfire. Earlier on Saturday, law enforcement sources confirmed that the person suspected of firing a weapon at a Pennsylvania Trump rally had been killed, as had at least one person in the crowd. Videos showed Trump grabbing his neck after apparent gunshots had been fired before Secret Service agents pulled him to the ground. They then took him away in an armored vehicle to a hospital where he was treated for injuries. The identity of the shooting suspect has not yet been released. from Alternet.org https://ift.tt/ILgqr53 via sinceretalk
Read more