Why whether Stormy Daniels 'was telling the truth or not' on the stand is 'almost irrelevant': legal expert



Since Donald Trump's New York hush money trial adjourned Tuesday, legal experts have floated predictions about whether or not the jury will convict the ex-president based on witness testimonies.

In connection to the allegations that the MAGA hopeful paid adult film actress Stormy Daniels $130,000 to stay quiet during his 2016 presidential campaign, ABC News reported earlier this month that "Daniels' description of her night with Trump served a crucial purpose for prosecutors," according to ex-prosecutor and ABC News legal contributor Chris Timmons.

ABC also noted, "It wasn't just the alleged intimate details that stand to impact the case -- Daniels' testimony about her conversations with Trump, including him allegedly telling her not to worry about his wife, Melania Trump – could help build the prosecution's case that the hush money payment was made to protect not his family, but his campaign."

READ MORE: 'Not going to comment': Johnson dodges Trump-Stormy Daniels allegations

However, during a conversation with MSNBC's Ari Melber Thursday, legal analyst and former FBI counsel Andrew Weissmann submitted that Daniels' testimony really doesn't matter all that much.

"I was in court for Stormy Daniels' testimony," Weissman said."The whole case here is about that Donald Trump is accused of not wanting her story to come out, and he had a cross examination of her that was hammer and tongs. And her testimony wasn't even all that important to the case."

The former FBI attorney continued, "Whether she was telling the truth or not was really almost, almost irrelevant because the issue is did he want that story to be out there or not. But [former National Enquirer publisher] David Pecker and [former Trump aide] Hope Hicks, who had very damaging information to give to the jury, they had very light cross examinations."

"So, in many ways, what you saw, with respect to Stormy Daniels, was almost a continuation of the reason he didn't want, in 2016, this story to come out," Weissmann emphasized.

READ MORE: For women who accused the Trump campaign of harassment — it’s been more harassment

"He still is adamant in trying to prove that this did not happen, and didn't want people to believe it. And you saw it in court, and it's what the actual charge is, and finally think Stormy Daniels did a really good job." He added, "She was wicked smart."

Watch the video below or at this link.

Why whether Daniels 'was telling the truth or not' on the stand is 'almost' irrelevant: legal expert www.youtube.com




from Alternet.org https://ift.tt/wAOEGrV
via sinceretalk

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PA GOP Senate candidate who says he 'started with nothing' actually grew up in a mansion

Image
David McCormick, who is Pennsylvania's presumptive Republican U.S. Senate nominee, has often suggested he grew up poor in a rural community. But a new report finds that his upbringing was far more affluent than he's suggested. The New York Times reported Friday that McCormick — a former hedge fund executive who lived in Connecticut as recently as 2022 — has been cagey with voters about his childhood. McCormick has tweeted that he was "raised in Bloomsburg working on his family's farm," said on a 2022 podcast that he " started with nothing " and told CBS News that same year that he " didn't have anything " growing up as the son of two schoolteachers. But according to the Times , McCormick's father, Dr. James H. McCormick , was appointed president of what is now Bloomsburg University by Gov. Milton Schapp (D) in 1973. He moved his family into Buckalew Place — the official mansion for presidents of the school that currently spans 5...
Read more

How misinformation could shape the Israel-Hamas war

Image
I wanted to interview Nicholas Grossman regarding the role of misinformation in the war between Israel and Hamas. In particular, I hoped to ask the professor of international relations at the University of Illinois, and senior editor of Arc Digital , about misinformation that arose from American reporting on an explosion at a hospital in Gaza. You know what? I ended up repeating a bit of misinformation! I asked him to lay out the facts about a blast that “killed hundreds, including kids,” and he said nuh-uh (not his words). In fact, Professor Grossman said, “there never were hundreds killed by an explosion at that hospital. Media reported that the hospital was destroyed by an Israeli airstrike killing 500, but that was based on something a Hamas-controlled agency said and was never supported by evidence.” Professor Grossman went on to say “what apparently did happen is something hit a nearby parking lot and caused a smaller explosion, most likely a rocket fired from Gaza towards I...
Read more

Trump was hit by glass fragments — not a bullet: report

Image
Law enforcement officials have claimed to two different sources that former President Donald Trump was not grazed by a bullet but rather by glass shards. The officials in question told both Newsmax's Alex Salvi and Axios' Juliegrace Brufke that Trump was hit by glass shards that may have erupted from the shattering of a teleprompter that was hit by gunfire. Earlier on Saturday, law enforcement sources confirmed that the person suspected of firing a weapon at a Pennsylvania Trump rally had been killed, as had at least one person in the crowd. Videos showed Trump grabbing his neck after apparent gunshots had been fired before Secret Service agents pulled him to the ground. They then took him away in an armored vehicle to a hospital where he was treated for injuries. The identity of the shooting suspect has not yet been released. from Alternet.org https://ift.tt/ILgqr53 via sinceretalk
Read more