George Conway explains why a legal expert’s pitch to the DOJ is 'an interesting gambit'



Former President Donald Trump's lawyers in his Mar-a-Lago classified documents case are arguing Jack Smith's appointment as special counsel in the case was not constitutional, as a part of their efforts to have the case thrown out all together.

Presiding Judge Aileen Cannon — who was appointed to the bench by Trump — is strongly considering the argument.

Conservative lawyer George Conway on Monday spoke with CNN's Erin Burnett about a pitch Conway's fellow legal expert, George Washington University law professor Randall Eliason made to the DOJ for how the department should move forward in handling the baseless argument against Smith.

READ MORE: Cannon’s latest moves leave analyst 'gobsmacked'

"I know that if she were to rule against Jack Smith in these cases, or his appointment, that would give him a chance to move to have her removed," Burnett said, "he might succeed, and this case could continue."

The CNN host then pointed to a tweet posted Eliason Monday, in which he makes a suggestion for the DOJ in the case Cannon rules that Smith was not properly appointed.

"He said, 'The government should not appeal," Burnett noted. "Instead, have the US attorney in Florida refile the same charges in a new case. Hope the case is reassigned to a different judge, and then have special counsel prosecutors designated as special assistant US attorneys in Florida to continue their prosecution of Trump. He says that would end up being a much quicker process."

The CNN host asked Conway, "What do you make of that argument?"

READ MORE: 'Recusal in a skinny-minute': How Jack Smith motion 'exposes Cannon to oversight'

The conservative lawyer replied, "I think it's an interesting gambit, and actually, Randy Eliason and I had an exchange about this on X (formerly Twitter), and I think the problem with his suggestion is that the next case that would be filed by the the US attorney in liu of the special counsel could also easily, under the local rules, as I read them, go to Judge Cannon. Because, arguably, it would be efficient to have the same judge handle that next case."

Conway continued, "Let's leave apart the question of whether or not she's competent and biased. So, the argument that Professor Eliason is suggesting is that the rule only applies to the assignment of cases where there's an existing present case already before the court, but I think the rule actually could go beyond that. And so I'm not at all sure that Professor Eliason's gambit would work."

Watch the video below or at this link.

George Conway: Why this legal expert’s 'interesting gambit' for DOJ may not work youtu.be



from Alternet.org https://ift.tt/mhkY6yx
via sinceretalk

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PA GOP Senate candidate who says he 'started with nothing' actually grew up in a mansion

Image
David McCormick, who is Pennsylvania's presumptive Republican U.S. Senate nominee, has often suggested he grew up poor in a rural community. But a new report finds that his upbringing was far more affluent than he's suggested. The New York Times reported Friday that McCormick — a former hedge fund executive who lived in Connecticut as recently as 2022 — has been cagey with voters about his childhood. McCormick has tweeted that he was "raised in Bloomsburg working on his family's farm," said on a 2022 podcast that he " started with nothing " and told CBS News that same year that he " didn't have anything " growing up as the son of two schoolteachers. But according to the Times , McCormick's father, Dr. James H. McCormick , was appointed president of what is now Bloomsburg University by Gov. Milton Schapp (D) in 1973. He moved his family into Buckalew Place — the official mansion for presidents of the school that currently spans 5...
Read more

How misinformation could shape the Israel-Hamas war

Image
I wanted to interview Nicholas Grossman regarding the role of misinformation in the war between Israel and Hamas. In particular, I hoped to ask the professor of international relations at the University of Illinois, and senior editor of Arc Digital , about misinformation that arose from American reporting on an explosion at a hospital in Gaza. You know what? I ended up repeating a bit of misinformation! I asked him to lay out the facts about a blast that “killed hundreds, including kids,” and he said nuh-uh (not his words). In fact, Professor Grossman said, “there never were hundreds killed by an explosion at that hospital. Media reported that the hospital was destroyed by an Israeli airstrike killing 500, but that was based on something a Hamas-controlled agency said and was never supported by evidence.” Professor Grossman went on to say “what apparently did happen is something hit a nearby parking lot and caused a smaller explosion, most likely a rocket fired from Gaza towards I...
Read more

Trump was hit by glass fragments — not a bullet: report

Image
Law enforcement officials have claimed to two different sources that former President Donald Trump was not grazed by a bullet but rather by glass shards. The officials in question told both Newsmax's Alex Salvi and Axios' Juliegrace Brufke that Trump was hit by glass shards that may have erupted from the shattering of a teleprompter that was hit by gunfire. Earlier on Saturday, law enforcement sources confirmed that the person suspected of firing a weapon at a Pennsylvania Trump rally had been killed, as had at least one person in the crowd. Videos showed Trump grabbing his neck after apparent gunshots had been fired before Secret Service agents pulled him to the ground. They then took him away in an armored vehicle to a hospital where he was treated for injuries. The identity of the shooting suspect has not yet been released. from Alternet.org https://ift.tt/ILgqr53 via sinceretalk
Read more