'Extremely narrow': NY prosecutors say Trump’s felonies should stand despite immunity ruling



Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's office just submitted its official response to the Supreme Court of the United States' immunity decision from earlier this month, and argues that his 34 felony convictions should still apply.

In a 69-page filing, Bragg and his team of prosecutors painstakingly laid out how former President Donald Trump being granted broad criminal immunity for official acts by SCOTUS doesn't change his late May conviction by a New York jury. Bragg argued that the crimes Trump committed in the lead-up to the 2016 presidential election are not tied to any official acts he took as president, and that no evidence prosecutors introduced ran significantly afoul of SCOTUS' immunity boundaries laid out in the Trump v. United States decision.

Bragg referred to a practice known as "harmless-error analysis" in which a criminal conviction can still be upheld despite a "harmless error" by a judge overseeing a criminal trial if that error is not rooted in bias or not significant enough to merit a reversal — like the admission of evidence later found to be admitted erroneously. A harmless error is different than a reversible error, as a reversible error requires a conviction be overturned while a harmless error does not.

READ MORE: 'Not very difficult': Former federal prosecutor explains how Alvin Bragg can convict Trump

"Like New York's courts, the U.S. Supreme Court 'repeatedly has held' that 'errors such as mistaken admission of evidence' are not 'immune from harmless-error analysis,'" Bragg wrote. "And, as particularly relevant here, the Supreme Court has applied harmless-error review even when the improperly admitted evidence involved 'conduct that was not criminal when the defendant engaged in that conduct.'"

"If a reviewing court can determine whether it was harmless to introduce evidence of conduct for which a defendant could not have been prosecuted because it was not a crime, then the same must be true for evidence of conduct for which a defendant could not have been prosecuted because of immunity," he continued. "Under both New York and federal law, harmless-error analysis is unavailable for only extremely narrow categories of errors—none of which include the erroneous introduction of evidence."

It's unclear how Judge Juan Merchan will rule given that the evidence compiled by the grand jury that led to Trump's indictment is still under seal, according to Business Insider legal correspondent Jacob Shamsian. While he opined that the harmless-error analysis could "cinch" Bragg's case that the convictions should be upheld, the fact that the evidence has not been made public remains a wild card.

"[W]e can't evaluate whether it would have violated the Supreme Court's immunity ruling — based on the public record, at least," Shamsian tweeted.

READ MORE: 'There's going to be a criminal conviction': Ex-Trump attorney predicts guilty verdict in NY

Trump was initially going to be sentenced for his 34 felony convictions on July 11 after being found guilty on all counts in late May. After SCOTUS' 6-3 ruling in the former president's favor in Trump v. United States, Merchan pushed sentencing back to September 18 in order to allow for time to review how the immunity decision may impact the verdict.

At the core of the case was Trump's role in orchestrating hush money payments to multiple women who claimed to have had affairs with him (Trump has denied the affairs) in order to prevent them from sharing their stories with the media ahead of the 2016 election. Bragg argued in his indictment that the payments — which were illegally labeled as legal expenses to his then-attorney, Michael Cohen — constituted illegal campaign contributions, as they were done to advance his political goals.

When he took the witness stand, Cohen testified that he made the payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal, and that Trump reimbursed him for those payments by calling the reimbursement a legal retainer. Cohen maintained there was no legal retainer and that the reimbursements were for the hush money payments.

READ MORE: Donald Trump guilty on all counts in New York criminal trial



from Alternet.org https://ift.tt/cBvsaTz
via sinceretalk

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PA GOP Senate candidate who says he 'started with nothing' actually grew up in a mansion

Image
David McCormick, who is Pennsylvania's presumptive Republican U.S. Senate nominee, has often suggested he grew up poor in a rural community. But a new report finds that his upbringing was far more affluent than he's suggested. The New York Times reported Friday that McCormick — a former hedge fund executive who lived in Connecticut as recently as 2022 — has been cagey with voters about his childhood. McCormick has tweeted that he was "raised in Bloomsburg working on his family's farm," said on a 2022 podcast that he " started with nothing " and told CBS News that same year that he " didn't have anything " growing up as the son of two schoolteachers. But according to the Times , McCormick's father, Dr. James H. McCormick , was appointed president of what is now Bloomsburg University by Gov. Milton Schapp (D) in 1973. He moved his family into Buckalew Place — the official mansion for presidents of the school that currently spans 5...
Read more

How misinformation could shape the Israel-Hamas war

Image
I wanted to interview Nicholas Grossman regarding the role of misinformation in the war between Israel and Hamas. In particular, I hoped to ask the professor of international relations at the University of Illinois, and senior editor of Arc Digital , about misinformation that arose from American reporting on an explosion at a hospital in Gaza. You know what? I ended up repeating a bit of misinformation! I asked him to lay out the facts about a blast that “killed hundreds, including kids,” and he said nuh-uh (not his words). In fact, Professor Grossman said, “there never were hundreds killed by an explosion at that hospital. Media reported that the hospital was destroyed by an Israeli airstrike killing 500, but that was based on something a Hamas-controlled agency said and was never supported by evidence.” Professor Grossman went on to say “what apparently did happen is something hit a nearby parking lot and caused a smaller explosion, most likely a rocket fired from Gaza towards I...
Read more

Trump was hit by glass fragments — not a bullet: report

Image
Law enforcement officials have claimed to two different sources that former President Donald Trump was not grazed by a bullet but rather by glass shards. The officials in question told both Newsmax's Alex Salvi and Axios' Juliegrace Brufke that Trump was hit by glass shards that may have erupted from the shattering of a teleprompter that was hit by gunfire. Earlier on Saturday, law enforcement sources confirmed that the person suspected of firing a weapon at a Pennsylvania Trump rally had been killed, as had at least one person in the crowd. Videos showed Trump grabbing his neck after apparent gunshots had been fired before Secret Service agents pulled him to the ground. They then took him away in an armored vehicle to a hospital where he was treated for injuries. The identity of the shooting suspect has not yet been released. from Alternet.org https://ift.tt/ILgqr53 via sinceretalk
Read more