'Big donors no longer essential': The 'psychological advantage' Harris has over Trump



Political analyst and former US Senator Claire McCaskill (D-MO) on Monday compared the difference between ex-President Donald Trump's campaign's current need for contributions from "big donors," versus Vice President Kamala Harris'.

Speaking with McCaskill, MSNBC host Alicia Menendez pointed to a Sunday article published by Reuters reporting that Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, have raised $540 million since launching last month — "the most ever for any presidential campaign in this time span."

The report notes that the amount includes $82 million the 2024 Democratic nominee received during the party's convention last week.

READ MORE: 'Let Trump be Trump': Harris campaign ramps up messaging strategy

"It's tactical advantage," over Trump and his running mate, Senator JD Vance (R-OH), Menendez noted. "It's also a psychological one."

The ex-Missouri lawmaker added, "Especially when you consider where that money is coming from."

McCaskill then noted, "One of my most interesting events at the convention was visiting with some big donors. And you know what they figured out, Alicia? They figured out that they're becoming irrelevant. Big donors are no longer essential to the Harris-Walz campaign."

The ex-senator pointed out that unlike Trump and Vance, Harris and Walz "are not going to spend time in venues trying to raise money from a bunch of folks who gathered a bunch of checks that have commas in them. They are getting their money from folks who are giving $5, $10, $25. That's where this money is coming from. It is broad based."

"Meanwhile, Vance, if you look at his schedule — he is dominating his days with raising money," McCaskill added. "So they are not in the same position that Harris-Walz is, in terms of this ground swell of volunteer support and monetary support. And maybe the best thing the internet has ever done for politics is maybe putting little money into politics is finally going to do a better job of taking big money out of politics, which we'd all like to see, especially after the Citizens United decision."

READ MORE: 'Trump should be quaking': Pollster’s inability to find women for focus group spells trouble for GOP

The US Supreme Court decided in the January 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) case that "corporations and other outside groups" can "engage in unlimited amounts of campaign spending," according to the Campaign Legal Center.

Watch the video below or at this link.

- YouTube www.youtube.com



from Alternet.org https://ift.tt/vm6t85V
via sinceretalk

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PA GOP Senate candidate who says he 'started with nothing' actually grew up in a mansion

Image
David McCormick, who is Pennsylvania's presumptive Republican U.S. Senate nominee, has often suggested he grew up poor in a rural community. But a new report finds that his upbringing was far more affluent than he's suggested. The New York Times reported Friday that McCormick — a former hedge fund executive who lived in Connecticut as recently as 2022 — has been cagey with voters about his childhood. McCormick has tweeted that he was "raised in Bloomsburg working on his family's farm," said on a 2022 podcast that he " started with nothing " and told CBS News that same year that he " didn't have anything " growing up as the son of two schoolteachers. But according to the Times , McCormick's father, Dr. James H. McCormick , was appointed president of what is now Bloomsburg University by Gov. Milton Schapp (D) in 1973. He moved his family into Buckalew Place — the official mansion for presidents of the school that currently spans 5...
Read more

How misinformation could shape the Israel-Hamas war

Image
I wanted to interview Nicholas Grossman regarding the role of misinformation in the war between Israel and Hamas. In particular, I hoped to ask the professor of international relations at the University of Illinois, and senior editor of Arc Digital , about misinformation that arose from American reporting on an explosion at a hospital in Gaza. You know what? I ended up repeating a bit of misinformation! I asked him to lay out the facts about a blast that “killed hundreds, including kids,” and he said nuh-uh (not his words). In fact, Professor Grossman said, “there never were hundreds killed by an explosion at that hospital. Media reported that the hospital was destroyed by an Israeli airstrike killing 500, but that was based on something a Hamas-controlled agency said and was never supported by evidence.” Professor Grossman went on to say “what apparently did happen is something hit a nearby parking lot and caused a smaller explosion, most likely a rocket fired from Gaza towards I...
Read more

Trump was hit by glass fragments — not a bullet: report

Image
Law enforcement officials have claimed to two different sources that former President Donald Trump was not grazed by a bullet but rather by glass shards. The officials in question told both Newsmax's Alex Salvi and Axios' Juliegrace Brufke that Trump was hit by glass shards that may have erupted from the shattering of a teleprompter that was hit by gunfire. Earlier on Saturday, law enforcement sources confirmed that the person suspected of firing a weapon at a Pennsylvania Trump rally had been killed, as had at least one person in the crowd. Videos showed Trump grabbing his neck after apparent gunshots had been fired before Secret Service agents pulled him to the ground. They then took him away in an armored vehicle to a hospital where he was treated for injuries. The identity of the shooting suspect has not yet been released. from Alternet.org https://ift.tt/ILgqr53 via sinceretalk
Read more