'He says it four times': Experts point out proof Trump 'doesn’t care about free speech'



Political experts are criticizing Donald Trump after the ex-president doubled down on a proposal he made last week, saying that people who burn the American flag should be jailed.

MSNBC's Jordan Rubin noted in an article last week:

The legal problem with that proposal is that it violates the First Amendment. The Supreme Court addressed the issue in the 1989 case Texas v. Johnson, when conservative icon Antonin Scalia joined the high court majority in deciding that a conviction for burning the flag was unconstitutional.

Trump repeated the proposal during his speech at the National Guard convention in Detroit Monday.

READ MORE: Trump could empower the Supreme Court to gut the First Amendment: analysis

"You burn an American flag, you go to jail for one year," the ex-president said. "Gotta do it. We gotta do it. They say, 'sir, that's unconstitution.' We'll make it constitution."

David J. Bier, director of immigrant studies at the Cato Institute, commented: "He didn’t say 'unconstitutionAL' or 'constitutionAL'; he says 'unconstitution' and 'constitution'. He says it four times. How did our country survive this person having the most powerful position in the history of the planet?"

The Bulwark's Tim Miller wrote: "Yesterday @RobertKennedyJr said he was endorsing Trump because the Democrats support censorship. Today Trump wants to change the first amendment so that he can jail people for flag burning."

The New York Times' Jane Coaston replied: "Censorship *of him.* Censorship of other people is fine."

READ MORE: What 'praying judge' Alito gets fundamentally wrong about faith and the First Amendment: analysis

Sarah Longwell, publisher of The Bulwark, added: "Periodic reminder that Trump doesn’t care at all about free speech."

Lawyer Andrew Fleishman noted: "First Amendment stuff is the best part of the current Supreme Court and so, thankfully, I don't think this will happen."

Lawyer Bradley P. Moss added: "'Well make it constitutional' @RichLowry (somewhere) - 'See, that’s the type of character and belief in the rule of law we need.'"

Rich Lowry is editor of the conservative National Review.

READ MORE: 'Big donors no longer essential': The 'psychological' advantage Harris has over Trump

Watch the video below or at this link.



from Alternet.org https://ift.tt/xPQWNaB
via sinceretalk

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PA GOP Senate candidate who says he 'started with nothing' actually grew up in a mansion

Image
David McCormick, who is Pennsylvania's presumptive Republican U.S. Senate nominee, has often suggested he grew up poor in a rural community. But a new report finds that his upbringing was far more affluent than he's suggested. The New York Times reported Friday that McCormick — a former hedge fund executive who lived in Connecticut as recently as 2022 — has been cagey with voters about his childhood. McCormick has tweeted that he was "raised in Bloomsburg working on his family's farm," said on a 2022 podcast that he " started with nothing " and told CBS News that same year that he " didn't have anything " growing up as the son of two schoolteachers. But according to the Times , McCormick's father, Dr. James H. McCormick , was appointed president of what is now Bloomsburg University by Gov. Milton Schapp (D) in 1973. He moved his family into Buckalew Place — the official mansion for presidents of the school that currently spans 5...
Read more

How misinformation could shape the Israel-Hamas war

Image
I wanted to interview Nicholas Grossman regarding the role of misinformation in the war between Israel and Hamas. In particular, I hoped to ask the professor of international relations at the University of Illinois, and senior editor of Arc Digital , about misinformation that arose from American reporting on an explosion at a hospital in Gaza. You know what? I ended up repeating a bit of misinformation! I asked him to lay out the facts about a blast that “killed hundreds, including kids,” and he said nuh-uh (not his words). In fact, Professor Grossman said, “there never were hundreds killed by an explosion at that hospital. Media reported that the hospital was destroyed by an Israeli airstrike killing 500, but that was based on something a Hamas-controlled agency said and was never supported by evidence.” Professor Grossman went on to say “what apparently did happen is something hit a nearby parking lot and caused a smaller explosion, most likely a rocket fired from Gaza towards I...
Read more

Trump was hit by glass fragments — not a bullet: report

Image
Law enforcement officials have claimed to two different sources that former President Donald Trump was not grazed by a bullet but rather by glass shards. The officials in question told both Newsmax's Alex Salvi and Axios' Juliegrace Brufke that Trump was hit by glass shards that may have erupted from the shattering of a teleprompter that was hit by gunfire. Earlier on Saturday, law enforcement sources confirmed that the person suspected of firing a weapon at a Pennsylvania Trump rally had been killed, as had at least one person in the crowd. Videos showed Trump grabbing his neck after apparent gunshots had been fired before Secret Service agents pulled him to the ground. They then took him away in an armored vehicle to a hospital where he was treated for injuries. The identity of the shooting suspect has not yet been released. from Alternet.org https://ift.tt/ILgqr53 via sinceretalk
Read more